All Posts in Social Media

June 22, 2016 - Comments Off on Engage: A Safer Twitter For Celebrities

Engage: A Safer Twitter For Celebrities

As an influential celebrity on the go, you've heard about Twitter, and your handlers are always telling you about what it can do for your brand. But what are you supposed to tweet about? And what happens if a normal tweets at you? Enter Engage, a new standalone app for influential Twitter users that takes some of the guesswork out of Twitter.

Twitter engage

The app, which is available today on iOS, is designed to help famous people interact with their fans and build a bigger following. The app includes three main tabs. Engage highlights the most important interactions you've had on Twitter, and includes mentions from users who are verified, followed by a lot of your followers, or interact with you a lot. An "understand" tab shows you high-level analytics for your posts, showing you how many impressions you're getting over time. And the "posts" tab shows you detailed performance numbers for individual posts.

One thing Engage doesn't have: a timeline. Engage is for the celebrity who sees the value in tweeting, but would rather not pay attention to the broader conversation in the global town square. If reading Twitter makes you upset, but you still want to be able to broadcast the details of your latest juice cleanse, Engage may be the app for you.

Engage seems to be modeled on Facebook Mentions, a two-year-old app that helps celebrities find posts that are talking about them. It differs from Engage in two significant ways. Mentions requires a verified Facebook account to use, whereas Engage will be available to all Twitter users. And while Facebook's version looks more or less like the flagship app with a special section added for monitoring mentions of your name, Engage is much more focused on analytics.

This story first appeared in The Verge, on June 21, 2016.

December 29, 2015 - Comments Off on The Fantasy And Fallacy Of ‘Organic’ Growth

The Fantasy And Fallacy Of ‘Organic’ Growth

Let’s say you are a brand. And let’s say, for fun, that you’ve hired a social-media-slash-digital agency to help your brand grow and prosper on the vast interweb. You want people to come to your website, check out your tweets, like and share your Facebook updates and eventually, buy your product or service from your online store. Your social-media-slash-digital agency promises you all these things and more, and starts your online campaign. They throw acronyms at you like SEO, SEM, SMM, TG, ER, CPC, CPM, CPA, CPF, and a million others. You are sufficiently impressed with their jargon and you approve a certain budget to spend on these acronyms. A month or two later, your sales haven’t moved, but your agency comes back to you with large smiles and tells you that your brand has achieved an impressive ‘organic’ growth and it’s only a matter of time that the sales start rolling in. Don’t fall for this swindle.

To be fair, it’s not completely the agency’s fault; it’s the kind of world we live in right now. But I’ll get to that a bit later. When someone says any of the following things to you, they are bullshitting you:

  1. Our organic reach is x Million.
  2. We are trending organically on Twitter!
  3. There’s a difference between ‘organic’ and ‘paid’ reach.

There is no such thing as organic growth anymore. At least for brands on social media. If you are paying a bunch of people to tweet to you, and if this is a fairly large bunch, and you happen to get listed as one of the trending topics of the day on Twitter, it’s not considered an ‘organic trend’. If you pay for ads on Facebook and your ad is shown to 10 people, then your so called ‘organic’ reach is automatically the total number of friends these 10 people have.

If there is money going out for a particular activity on digital, the returns you get for that activity aren’t organic. This is the fantasy that exists in the industry today. This trend was probably introduced as a way to placate the dinosaurial marketing managers who are stuck in the cusp of today’s intangible ‘reach’ and ‘engagement’ and yesterday’s TRPs and ‘press clippings’. If you tell a guy that he’s getting more bang for his buck, he’s always happy.

Social media marketing, today, has become a numbers game. And the only number that counts, is unfortunately, the amount of money that’s being spent. Very few brands have managed to achieve true organic growth, and this has taken them years of perseverance and hard work.

This is just me – one person’s opinion – on this trend. What do you think? Give me your opinions in the comments section